歲末年初，親友團聚增多，各種美味佳餚端上桌，要提醒的是，有些家庭的餐桌上往往以大魚大肉為主，且單調重復，如果吃喝過度，不單會在身上堆滿令人討厭的贅肉，更可能會誘發一系列疾病。
節日期間，餐桌上的食物要及時更新，多些花樣，纔有益健康。
第一肉鱸魚
鱸魚含有豐富的、易消化的蛋白質、脂肪、維生素B2、尼克酸、鈣、磷、鉀、銅、鐵、硒等。中醫認為鱸魚性溫味甘，有健脾胃、補肝腎、止咳化痰的作用。冬天，鱸魚肥腴可人，肉白如雪，魚肉細膩，是最好的品鱸魚季節。中醫認為鱸魚性溫味甘，有健脾胃、補肝腎、止咳化痰的作用。
【溫馨提醒】鱸魚適宜貧血頭暈、婦女妊娠水腫、胎動不安之人食用，但患有皮膚病瘡腫者忌食。
到春節了，勞累了一年的上班族終於可以好好的放松一下，盡情的享受節日。在享受節日的同時也要預防“節日綜合癥”，還要吃的健康。下面讓小編為大家介紹以下飲食注意事項。
一、勿暴飲暴食
每餐只能吃八分飽，不可吃得太橕。在食物方面，五谷主食不可少。多吃富含纖維素、維生素的新鮮蔬菜、水果，以促進胃腸蠕動，加快體內有害物質的排泄過程。
二、重質不重量
新鮮食物雖營養，但每次最好只煮一餐分量，而且要注意衛生安全。慎防病從口入。因此，剩菜應用保鮮膜包好，放置在冰箱內冷藏。此外，廚房最好准備兩套碪板和刀具，熟食、生食分開處理，以免交叉污染。
飯後嚼口香糖可以護牙、潔齒、清新口氣。然而，據美國“福克斯新聞網”1月17日報道，總嚼口香糖可能會帶來六大副作用。
1.更愛吃垃圾食品。有報道稱，飯前嚼口香糖可以消除飢餓感。然而，英國《飲食行為》雜志刊登一項研究糾正了這一誤傳。研究發現，嚼口香糖不僅不影響熱量攝入，而且薄荷味的口香糖還會導致水果蔬菜變苦，減少健康食物的攝入量，增加吃薯片、糖果等垃圾食品的機會。建議飯前喝一小杯綠茶，可控制食欲，幫助減肥。
2.誘發頭痛。美國加州長灘牙科博士多恩·阿特金斯表示，總嚼口香糖會導致咬肌及下顎關節疼痛。很多患者最終因為下巴及頭頸部肌肉收縮而導致頭痛、耳痛或牙痛。專家建議，想嚼口香糖的時候可以吃個苹果滿足“嚼欲”。
3.腹脹腹瀉。美國加州洛杉磯文森特醫學中心胃腸病學博士帕特裡克·塔卡哈什表示，總嚼口香糖容易導致大量空氣吞咽入肚，誘發腹痛和脹氣，口香糖中的山梨醇等人工甜味劑還會使某些人群腹瀉，進而導致腸易激綜合征。專家建議，胃腸不好的人最好別吃口香糖。
4.導致齲齒。大部分口香糖都是以蔗糖為甜味劑，咀嚼時，糖分會長時間停留在口腔內，給致齲菌產生酸性物質提供了有利條件，因而更容易長齲齒。
貧血和營養不良不是一個概念
鐵是造血原料，大多貧血的人都缺鐵
每百克大棗含鐵僅為2.1毫克，遠遠低於蟶子、鴨血等
張倩：中國疾病預防控制中心營養與食品安全所副研究員，悉尼大學營養學博士。
如果一個人臉色蒼白，身體瘦弱，或者女性月經過多，那多半是貧血。說起貧血，大家自然會說要補血，而說到補血，大家的第一反應往往是大棗。那大棗究竟能不能補血呢？
Understanding sponsorship
The answer to the question, "how are you going to pay for this project?" is turning out to be sponsorship more and more often. If you don't know why organizations want to sponsor things, though, it's likely a long, hard road to find the sponsorship you seek.
As the number of media options continue to explode (blogs, books, conferences, tattoos, speaking engagements, film festivals, stadiums, entire websites...) it's worth thinking a little bit about why organizations buy sponsorships.
1. It might be a substitute for advertising. How many people see it? How much does it cost per person? (this is the cpm, but instead of cost per thousand page views or magazine readers, it's cost per thousand impressions, which come in a myriad of ways). I think this is the film festival/book fair model. It's a reasonable way to reach a hard to reach, high value group.
Less vs. more, give vs. take
You could build a company dedicated to paying your employees ever more. Or you could build a company based on the strategy of paying them ever less.
You could create a business based on the idea of charging your customers the lowest possible prices, or you could set out to figure out how to charge them as much as possible.
Your organization could depend on ever increasing the amount of choice and privacy you give your users--or you could work daily to reduce them.
You could protect your users from interruption or you could decide to profit from interruption.
You could fight daily to tell those that are listening the truth, or you could fight daily to spin your story to have it seen as the truth.
It's tempting to view each of these extremes as merely an alternative to compromise, but compromise isn't a goal, it's a temporary tactic. Where are you headed?
We move the center when we become extremists in our goals.
Every day, we push against the status quo and make difficult choices. Every day, we seek to increase one metric at the expense of the other. The architecture of the successful organization depends on choosing and embracing these extremes.
"But what if I fail?"
You will.
The answer to the what if question is, you will.
A better question might be, "after I fail, what then?"
Well, if you've chosen well, after you fail you will be one step closer to succeeding, you will be wiser and stronger and you almost certainly be more respected by all of those that are afraid to try.
The humility of the artist
It seems arrogant to say, "perhaps this isn't for you."
When the critic pans your work, or the prospect hears your offer but doesn't buy, the artist responds, "that's okay, it's not for you." She doesn't wheedle or flip-flop or go into high pressure mode. She treats different people differently, understands that she is working to delight the weird, not please the masses, and walks away.
Isn't that arrogant?
No. It's arrogant to assume that you've made something so extraordinary that everyone everywhere should embrace it. Our best work can't possibly appeal to the average masses, only our average work can.
Copyediting, line editing and the other kind
The copyeditor will fix a misstated fact, spot a typo and get your prose clean.
The line editor will rearrange a paragraph and help you organize a thought more clearly.
And the editor who is your partner will tell you that the chapters are in the wrong order, that you must delete a third of what you wrote, or perhaps consider writing for TV instead. This kind of editor is the one who will tell you your time is better spent doing something else entirely.
It's easier (but not easy) to find a good copyeditor than it is to find someone generous and brave enough to help you figure out your strategy, whether you're working on a book, a career or the structure of your next project.
"Bring us your problems"
We're far more aware of our problems than our opportunities. Our problems nag at us, annoy us and paralyze us.
Every organization wrestles with its problems, and is eager to solve them.
When you generously invite people to bring you their problems, they might just do that.
Solving problems—actually solving them, not just claiming you do—solving perceived, urgent problems, is a surefire way to get the world to beat a path to your door. [HT to Adrian for the photo.]
